9th grade · Social Studies · Unit 6 of 9
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
How the Court reads the Constitution
What your child practices
Landmark decisions from Marbury v. Madison to recent cases, including Miranda v. Arizona, judicial activism and restraint, precedent, and how readings of the Bill of Rights and civil rights have changed, presented factually and from more than one side.
Arizona Academic Standards learning standard: HS.C2.3 · landmark Supreme Court cases and how rights have changed over time
How we explain it
Children can open this short lesson before they practice.
- Precedent (stare decisis) means following earlier rulings. Activism strikes down laws or expands rights broadly; restraint defers to lawmakers.
- McCulloch (1819) gave Congress implied powers; Mapp (1961) barred illegally seized evidence; Miranda (1966) requires warning suspects of their rights.
- United States v. Nixon (1974): even the president must obey a subpoena.
Example: What did United States v. Nixon (1974) hold? Nixon refused to hand over tapes. The Court said the president must obey a subpoena; executive privilege isn’t absolute. Answer: The president must obey a subpoena
Landmark Supreme Court Cases in Arizona
In the Arizona Academic Standards, this is unit 6 of 9 in 9th grade Social Studies, after Elections & Voting and before The Arizona Constitution.
Gradelings describes a child's practice on this unit as Beginning, Approaching, Meeting or Exceeding (Four practice steps). That reflects practice, not a report-card mark: the teacher decides the mark.
- 9th grade guide for Arizona parents
- Printable 9th grade Social Studies sheet
- Arizona report cards explained
Source: Arizona Department of Education
Sample questions
A taste of this unit. In the app, questions change every time and get easier or harder to match your child.
Question 1
The Miranda warning protects rights in the…
- Fifth and Sixth Amendments
- Tenth Amendment
- First and Second Amendments
Fifth and Sixth Amendments
Hint: The Fifth protects against self-incrimination; the Sixth guarantees a lawyer.
Question 2
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) held that…
- trials are secret
- juries are optional
- police may search anywhere
- illegally seized evidence can't be used in state courts
illegally seized evidence can't be used in state courts
Hint: This is the exclusionary rule.
Question 3
Miranda v. Arizona (1966) requires police to…
- hold people forever
- search any home
- tell arrested people their rights
- skip trials
tell arrested people their rights
Hint: "You have the right to remain silent."
Question 4
Sandra Day O'Connor, who served in the Arizona Senate, was the first woman on the…
- US Supreme Court
- US Senate
- Arizona Corporation Commission
US Supreme Court
Hint: President Reagan named her in 1981.
Question 5
Marbury v. Madison (1803) established…
- the income tax
- the right to vote
- judicial review
- segregation
judicial review
Hint: Courts can strike down unconstitutional laws.
Question 6
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) held that…
- banks are illegal
- Congress has implied powers and states cannot tax a federal bank
- states can ignore federal laws
- Maryland owned the bank
Congress has implied powers and states cannot tax a federal bank
Hint: The necessary and proper clause.